Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 07:47
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 118
44% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 161
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 255A) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 33
Parallax 31.9
20% 29.7 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 22.4
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 285 285 282 280 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 312
Write 280
Mixed 238
SusWrite 281
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 26.9
100% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 34.8
32% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-562.A00LF 9905403-562.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback