Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 13 '17 at 12:00
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1820-$56
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 90.9
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 140
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 150
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 230
MSI(1462 8099) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.01 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 491
Write 447
Mixed 475
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 10.4
64% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 53.8
88% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
343GB free
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 96.3
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.55
103% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 CT25664BA160B.C8FE 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback