Lenovo 20HJS3MA03

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20HJS3MA03  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJS3MA03
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 03:18
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 199
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 569
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 224D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 7.5
5% 16.5 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 390
Mixed 368
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 281
228% 324 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 125%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
80GB free
Firmware: 11170101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,970
Write 1,616
Mixed 1,524
379% 1,703 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 68
230% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,045
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 806
600% 808 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 278%
USB Flash Disk 253GB
176GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 126
Mixed 116
162% 129 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 3.8
180% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
71GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 91.7
Mixed 97.6
132% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.2
153% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC Kingston 9905630-031.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HJS3MA03 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20HJS3MA03

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback