Asus Z87-DELUXE/DUAL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Z87-DELUXE/DUAL  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 00:19
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 231
69% 128 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 559
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
HP(103C 2B49) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 81.6
Parallax 72.6
56% 74.2 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 63.1
56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fattydove 120GB 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 400
Mixed 35.5
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 1.5
47% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 73.5
DQ Write 3.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
10% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 162 162 162 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: A3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 130 130 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 129
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 100 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 93
Write 75.4
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 98.9
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 31 30 17 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 103
Write 31
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 27.9
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 52%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
57GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 18.4
Write 16.2
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 16.6
23% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.7
231% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DCLT8GN128S Transcend JM1333KLH-8G 0215 CMX32GX3M4A1600C11 Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-DELUXE/DUAL Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z87-DELUXE/DUAL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback