HP 470 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 470 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 883D
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 241
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 596
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
HP(103C 883D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 40.4
35% 35.8 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 34.1
27% 31.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 851 853 787 785 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,373
Write 904
Mixed 844
SusWrite 738
215% 965 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 72.1
253% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 341
329% 501 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 204%
Great: 209%
Aps-sl3n 1TB 1TB
612GB free
Firmware: T0605A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 411 366 104 72 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 477
Write 387
Mixed 372
SusWrite 227
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 15.9
98% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 31.5
85% 176 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 29.3
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 19.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 470 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 470 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback