Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 19:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 158
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 503
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 1,201
74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 15.1
14% 17.2 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT03L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 168 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 463
Write 168
Mixed 189
SusWrite 168
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 24.9
98% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 47
DQ Mixed 63.6
59% 94 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
867GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 138
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
177% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270CH0-CH9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback