Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4@ 1.70GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 71
2-Core 139
60% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 510
44% 378 Pts
64-Core 1,156
72% 1,156 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.7% Good
Lighting 82.1
Reflection 87.1
Parallax 83.4
67% 84.2 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 85.9
Splatting 75
72% 90.4 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTS952T 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0S86A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 162 113 113 117 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 482
Write 399
Mixed 375
SusWrite 140
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 39.4
137% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 98.6
119% 205 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 89%
Micron_5100_MTFDDAK480TCB 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: D0MU027
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 240 238 239 239 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 245
Write 235
Mixed 204
SusWrite 239
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 24.5
92% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 186
138% 181 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965690-014.A00G 9965690-014.A00G 9965698-012.A00G 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 15.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback