Biostar A68N-5000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5000  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140422
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 08:06
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 8.3
2-Core 17
6% 12.6 Pts
4-Core 23.7
8-Core 16.8
3% 20.2 Pts
64-Core 13.8
1% 13.8 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Biostar(1565 170A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 56 47 34 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 11.2
Write 18.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 44.8
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 63%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
88GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 35 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 36.2
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 34
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.79% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.5
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 1,200
3% 1,200 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5000 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback