Asus U31SD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus U31SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK U31SD
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110307
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 05:04
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 88.6
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 116
59% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 176
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 16F2) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 388 389 416 350 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 306
Write 358
Mixed 326
SusWrite 375
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 32.6
101% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 156
141% 216 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 125%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 28 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 23.1
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 28
19% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U31SD Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus U31SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback