Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 187
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 481
51% 408 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 72.8
62% 75.9 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 70.4
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 453 468 468 448 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 440
Mixed 354
SusWrite 425
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 40.3
143% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 350
267% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
427GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 675 635 639 621 605 601 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,632
Write 1,508
Mixed 666
SusWrite 629
247% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 52.9
182% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 732
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 638
475% 635 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 188%
Great: 254%
Seagate ST4000NE0025-2EW107 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 220 221 224 224 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 201
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 210
132% 181 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
286% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
376GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 170 170 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 167
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 164
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 34.8
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback