MSI A78M-E45 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A78M-E45 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 00:46
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 85.8
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 98.6
55% 84 Pts
4-Core 99.7
8-Core 99.3
13% 99.5 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 34
Parallax 52.4
32% 42.1 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 23.4
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
467GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 647 645 671 671 671 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 767
Mixed 795
SusWrite 647
175% 778 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 92.9
302% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 294
219% 290 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 183%
Great: 372%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 45 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 45
Write 44.4
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 44.8
31% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26%
Great: 49%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
309GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 139 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 115
SusWrite 142
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 81%
Great: 79%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
51GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 74.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 57.9
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 54%
SEMC SD CCR-80 4GB
0GB free, PID e134
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 6
8% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
64% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-E45 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A78M-E45 (MS-7721) - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback