Xenta MS-7B29

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemXenta MS-7B29  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star H310M PRO-VDH (MS-7B29)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1824 x 1036 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 22:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 498
67% 500 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
MSI(1462 2308) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 1.8
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZY25SATA120 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 414 403 217 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 401
Mixed 404
SusWrite 291
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 45.3
169% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 249
191% 256 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-2400 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7B29 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Xenta MS-7B29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback