Monster ABRA A5 V16.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.4
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190302
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 513
57% 451 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8560) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 50.2
47% 64.3 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 48.2
39% 46.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 310 309 310 311 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 961
Mixed 816
SusWrite 462
194% 871 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 78.8
262% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 769
DQ Mixed 967
698% 904 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 198%
Great: 235%
SSD Starsway-N210 128GB
77GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 397 386 135 57 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 449
Write 390
Mixed 376
SusWrite 239
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 20.8
104% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 42.7
89% 176 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
377GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 61.5
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 62.7
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 63%
ASMT 2115 750GB
266GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 99 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 91.8
Write 88.8
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 98.6
99% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.4 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback