LG S460-L.BG22P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG S460-L.BG22P1  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta LG2C
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 20:57
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 105
50% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 168
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1854 1817) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 78 99 55 51 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 457
Write 352
Mixed 321
SusWrite 80.5
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 24.4
91% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 191
157% 224 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
625GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 99
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 97.1
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 9905428-155.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S460-L.BG22P1 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: LG S460-L.BG22P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback