HP 550

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 550  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3618
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5270
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 35.7
30% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 35.9
8-Core 35.9
5% 35.9 Pts
64-Core 36
2% 36 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer SA100 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN7876
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 177 23 25 23 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 207
Write 73.5
Mixed 187
SusWrite 76
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 16.2
59% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 22.1
18% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 93%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
16GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.5 3.5 11 8.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Read 27.8
Write 7.7
Mixed 8
SusWrite 7.1
14% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback