Dell Precision T5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision T5600
MotherboardDell Precision T5600  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 09:21
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 63
2-Core 126
52% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 482
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.66
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 6.7
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 132 132 133 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 386
Write 131
Mixed 162
SusWrite 132
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 22.3
97% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 66.2
98% 189 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 76%
WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 236
Write 194
Mixed 137
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 7.3
48% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 36.3
38% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Samsung MZMPC256 256GB
30GB free
Firmware: 6L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 136 122 122 81 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.9% Above average
Read 388
Write 177
Mixed 215
SusWrite 121
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 22.8
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 124
104% 156 MB/s
External USB3.0 160GB
72GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28.1
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 28.3
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 44%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
192GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 78.1
Write 81.1
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 78.8
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-YK0 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 25.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback