Toshiba Satellite L840D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite L840D  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Pumori
Memory2.2 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 02:16
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 80.5
44% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 116
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Toshiba(1179 FB55) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 4
0% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 39 31 31 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 85
Write 48.9
Mixed 40
SusWrite 33.1
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3010EF48E7W1333 Kingston KX830D-ELC 5GB
667, 667 MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L840D Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L840D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback