Ace LogiCAD 497A - QEB2021A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive508% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAce LogiCAD 497A - QEB2021A  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11SSL-i
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 23:38
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7262 8-Core
CPU, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 860
79% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,259
78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 177
Parallax 180
144% 178 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 157
Splatting 147
132% 164 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 132%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.6.C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 40 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
508% Outstanding
Read 5,404
Write 42.4
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 38.7
289% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 719
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4.1
1,096% 242 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 508%
Great: 246%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 162 162 161 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 171
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 161
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 40.2
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 28.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LogiCAD 497A - QEB2021A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Ace LogiCAD 497A - QEB2021A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback