MSI MS-B902

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-B90211
MotherboardMSI MS-B902  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 05:05
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 614
61% 497 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 284
Parallax 362
258% 321 fps
MRender 333
Gravity 257
Splatting 188
204% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 212%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 141 150 62 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 402
Write 173
Mixed 167
SusWrite 119
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 21.5
104% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 134
106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 95%
Nvme WDS100T3XHC-00SJ 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: 1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1672 1468 1504 1525 1020 530 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,681
Write 2,106
Mixed 1,818
SusWrite 1,286
389% 1,723 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 67.6
237% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 855
646% 871 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 258%
Great: 317%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
181GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 62
Write 65.1
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 75.5
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
438GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 108 108 111 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 129
Write 30.1
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 108
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 114%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
635GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 147 145 153 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 182
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 150
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-B902 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI MS-B902

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback