HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory1.2 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 01:09
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 B28
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 99.6
49% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 97.6
8-Core 97.1
13% 97.3 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.2
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721016CLA382 160GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPEOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 34 7.9 8.1 4.2 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 60.6
Write 60.3
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 18.4
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 37GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback