Zoostorm 7876-9031A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7876-9031A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H61M-DS2 DVI
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 19:34
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 384
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 75.9
0% 45.4 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 44.8
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC7110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 234 235 207 226 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 253
Write 236
Mixed 197
SusWrite 225
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 26
93% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 135
113% 165 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
203GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 167 168 165 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 135
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 166
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7876-9031A Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Zoostorm 7876-9031A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback