HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 183E
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 102
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 125
61% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 140
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 183E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hyperx Fury 3D 240GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 86 72 78 162 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 448
Write 346
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 126
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 17.6
92% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 135
124% 190 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 22.5
178% 22.5 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback