Sicomputer Nauta 01C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSicomputer Nauta 01C  (all builds)
MotherboardSi N150CU
Memory14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 157
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 339
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 1404) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.67 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$99
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 392 220 218 225 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 1,597
Mixed 1231
SusWrite 329
263% 1,175 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 57.7
195% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 565
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 383
304% 429 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 163%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS016G-H2666G 8A76 LD4AS016G-3200ST 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.4% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 20.6
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nauta 01C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer Nauta 01C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback