Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 64 2-Core 106 55% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 162 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sony(104D 90AB) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.57 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 48 43 51 57 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 451 Write 341 Mixed 118 SusWrite 72.1 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 21.1 79% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 96.7 DQ Mixed 172 134% 189 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 149GB free Firmware: GG2OAC90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 80 80 82 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 58.9 Write 57 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 79.9 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	8x
Core(TL) i3-3100MIntel(R(Bench 41%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	9x

SSD
SKC600512G 512GBKingstonBench 109%, 5,390 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	1x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $70