Dell OptiPlex 780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 780
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 780  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 12 '17 at 11:16
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 76.7
42% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 152
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Nvidia(10DE 109A) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.9% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 9.69
7% 9.03 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 11.8
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
515GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 75.4
Write 75.7
Mixed 69.6
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.22
57% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
292GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 101
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
6GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 17
Write 5.71
Mixed 8.11
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.59
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.01
24% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 780 Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback