Biostar A68N-2100E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-2100E  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 16:14
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2150 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 33.8
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 32.8
19% 27.7 Pts
4-Core 32.5
8-Core 32.2
4% 32.3 Pts
64-Core 30.8
2% 30.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 840D) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 1.07 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 69 77 74 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 77.4
Write 94.6
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 69.7
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 59%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID 0736
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.7 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.53% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.1
7% 6.72 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.4
98% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-2100E Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-2100E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback