Supermicro X8SIL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X8SIL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8SIL
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 16:13
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 140
58% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 318
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 10% Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 49 113 126 134 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 67
SusWrite 112
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K73CHD-YF8 M393B1K73DH0-YF8 M393B1K73CHD-YF8 M393B1K73CHD-YF8 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8SIL Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X8SIL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback