ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10J0S1YT00

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Lenovo 10J0S1YT00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30D2
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220422
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '22 at 15:41
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900T 150 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 163 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 163 21% 161 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake) 16,316 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 30D2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.64% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.3 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 5.4 4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB 3,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 121 113 114 119 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 423 Write 382 Mixed 337 SusWrite 138 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 31.8 109% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 156 124% 173 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 90%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 1,481 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 9GB free, PID 09c2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.8 6 6 6 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.47% Terrible	Read 34.8 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 5.6 9% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M8FF 1x16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.6 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 10J0S1YT00 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10J0S1YT00

CPU
Celeron G3900TIntelBench 51%, 150 samples	17x

GPU
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	17x

SSD
SUV500M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 75%, 3,393 samples	10x
HG6 128GBToshibaBench 79%, 5,641 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	9x
CT16G4SFRA266.M8FF 1x16GBCrucialBench 37%, 37 samples	4x
CT8G4SFRA266.C8FP Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GBUnknownBench 57%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback