Lenovo 80SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 5
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160921
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 143
51% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 201
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 0018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 21 23 22 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 324
Write 21.2
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 24.2
22% 104 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 11.6
59% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 30.4
39% 74 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3230KE68H9F2133 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SJ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback