Asus PRIME H310M-F R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-F R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 12:14
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 469
63% 468 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.1
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19
Splatting 15.6
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 109 165 109 72 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 392
Write 399
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 114
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 10.7
104% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 32.4
80% 163 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4B8G2J2666A15D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-F R2.0 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-F R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback