Notebook W65_W670SH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemNotebook W65_W670SH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_W670SH
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 151
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6565) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.3
3% 5.17 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC128HBFU-000L1 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM14M1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 244 246 247 248 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 415
Write 249
Mixed 243
SusWrite 246
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 24.6
97% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 124
107% 163 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 102
65% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_W670SH Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_W670SH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback