Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 20:55
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 215
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 643
66% 531 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 102
Parallax 104
75% 99.4 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 92.2
76% 92.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 169 210 98 104 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 459
Write 372
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 171
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 27
114% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 163
126% 179 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 412 445 462 461 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 424
Mixed 408
SusWrite 444
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 57.9
188% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 345
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 193 203 193 205 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 176
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 200
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.6
330% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 109%
Great: 136%
JMicron 1TB
220GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 77 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 61.1
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 78.2
88% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 71%
Generic External 2TB
934GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 36.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 37.8
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-PLUS - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback