Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 18:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 127
55% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 350
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 75A1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.6% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 63.2
24% 41.1 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 60
54% 67.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1526 1455 1462 1462 1469 1489 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 985
Write 1,646
Mixed 1,127
SusWrite 1,477
298% 1,309 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 40.2
118% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 451
336% 449 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 187%
Great: 334%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15-SA Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback