Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 17:09
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 197
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 305
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 59
Parallax 81.1
46% 65.6 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 45.7
47% 59.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 267 272 296 312 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 388
Write 349
Mixed 318
SusWrite 288
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 36.8
120% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 317
237% 318 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 124%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 120 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 107
Write 122
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 120
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
111GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 115 116 117 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 84.1
Write 89.4
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 116
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 109%
WDC WD40 PURX-64GVNY0 4TB
921GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 94 95 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 100
Write 75.8
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 92.7
101% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 859B BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $735
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback