PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180309 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '22 at 17:09 |
Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 267 272 296 312 267 MB/s
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 120 121 122 121 MB/s
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
111GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 115 116 117 119 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD40 PURX-64GVNY0 4TB
921GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 94 95 92 93 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 859B BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 994x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $169Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 331x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 164x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 255x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 244x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 217x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $735 |