HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 19:17
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 582
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 461 458 451 462 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 435
Mixed 389
SusWrite 458
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 48.2
152% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 286
235% 336 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 38.3
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 39.9
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 97%
WD My Book 25ED 18TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 40.1
Write 39.8
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 43
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.8
377% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.6
386% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 111%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 34.7
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 37
48% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
195% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
820GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 142 136 140 140 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 136
Write 145
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 142
170% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57%
Great: 98%
STECH Simple Drive 1TB
119GB free, PID ce07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Read 33.6
Write 0.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 0.8
7% 9.22 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback