Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 132
61% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 227
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
PwrHis(1787 2291) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 177 184 181 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 136
Write 184
Mixed 159
SusWrite 174
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 24.7
82% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 30.8
26% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
445GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 61 59 58 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 66.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 59.6
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2 Builds (Compare 1,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback