Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 18:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 199
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 372
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 29.5
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 15.8
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_M.2_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 127 115 146 66 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 483
Write 386
Mixed 385
SusWrite 144
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 28
134% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 0.6
56% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77%
Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
38GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 92 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 97.1
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 13.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback