Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 95 45% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 134 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 61.4 4% 61.4 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1425) 731MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
256gb EVM SSD 256GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 50 9.8 120 41 50 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 215 Write 190 Mixed 201 SusWrite 63.4 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 13.6 54% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 39.4 56% 102 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD73I1B1674EU 1x2GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	143x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	12x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	9x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 884 samples	5x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	4x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 692 samples	4x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $195

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16