Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemDell Precision M6800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07PKW5
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 140
58% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 381
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ValueTech 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 76 77 64 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 405
Write 113
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 110
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 1.1
46% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 53.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
23% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V -63 1TB
531GB free
Firmware: AX001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 100 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 96.4
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 102
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Kingston KN2M64-ETB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 17.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback