CMS 7200-0209A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive15.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemCMS 7200-0209A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A68HM-PLUS
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 05:51
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 54
2-Core 78.8
43% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 67.8
13% 87.8 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 12.6
6% 8.93 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 73 12 32 46 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.9% Very poor
Read 132
Write 74.7
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 37.8
17% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 6.4
25% 7.77 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 12.4
10% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
5GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 47 46 48 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 51.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 48.7
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
76GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 13 32 48 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 105
Write 89
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 43.1
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 84%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
6GB free, PID 0245
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 10.5
Mixed 6
8% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 5
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-0209A Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 7200-0209A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback