Notebook P7xxDM3(-G)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook P7xxDM3(-G)  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P7xxDM3(-G)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 21:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 72
2-Core 143
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 390
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7708) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 67.5
24% 42.5 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 86.5
58% 67.9 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 262 240 236 254 241 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 352
Write 260
Mixed 206
SusWrite 251
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 17
71% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 119
119% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
896GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 80.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 103
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
154GB free
Firmware: 2BC10008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 74.6
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 66.1
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX32GX4M2A3000C16 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7xxDM3(-G) Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Notebook P7xxDM3(-G)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback