Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 866
88% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
175% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 227
Parallax 285
202% 253 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 221
Splatting 163
178% 227 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 175%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 176 216 235 242 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 486
Write 159
Mixed 208
SusWrite 218
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 34.6
136% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 163
130% 183 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 124%
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE8512GNTD 512GB
87GB free
Firmware: E8TM24.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 168 118 118 119 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 417
Write 251
Mixed 139
SusWrite 125
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 6.6
92% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 202
208% 349 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 165%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 2TB
895GB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2309 2364 1873 171 402 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 2,034
Mixed 1,457
SusWrite 1,222
345% 1,523 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 67.9
212% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 832
625% 836 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 234%
Great: 379%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
788GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 75.7
Write 77.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 109
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 25.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback