Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 353%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory494 GB free of 512 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 17:36
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 279
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,122
100% 843 Pts
64-Core 5,944
368% 5,944 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 403A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 313
Parallax 363
271% 336 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 267
Splatting 198
218% 277 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 223%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4745 4067 3853 3643 3930 3889 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
438% Outstanding
Read 2,768
Write 4,926
Mixed 2,174
SusWrite 4,021
788% 3,472 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.6
150% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 859
623% 806 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 438%
Great: 495%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 425 426 423 425 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 422
Mixed 391
SusWrite 425
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 41.5
136% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 165
134% 191 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
712GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 424 426 422 425 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 423
Mixed 387
SusWrite 424
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 42.2
138% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 187
135% 178 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 125%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 164 163 164 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 159
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 165
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 162 160 160 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 150
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 162
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 168 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 157
Mixed 111
SusWrite 169
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 163 162 163 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 154
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 163
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CVF 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
244% Outstanding
MC Read 104
MC Write 84.4
MC Mixed 116
291% 102 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 34.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 244%
Great: 254%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback