_____________________________ ________________

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive452% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System_____________________________ ________________  (all builds)
Motherboard_____________________________ ________________
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 186
2-Core 364
115% 215 Pts
4-Core 711
8-Core 1,403
125% 1,057 Pts
64-Core 3,089
191% 3,089 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 110
Parallax 113
95% 113 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 100
Splatting 93.6
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
711GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3405 3413 3418 2056 1561 1577 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 2,926
Write 3,401
Mixed 3,119
SusWrite 2,572
679% 3,004 MB/s
4K Read 84
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 119
389% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 1,192
DQ Mixed 1,284
958% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 452%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 126
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 35.2
195% 68.2 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 40.9
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 174%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ________________ Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

System: _____________________________ ________________

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback