Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemArcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 181
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 353
45% 342 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox SD250-480GQN 480GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0818A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 188 195 188 187 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 215
Write 183
Mixed 182
SusWrite 191
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 15.1
66% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 16.8
19% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PCGBLOPT58GSFF11 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback