Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 21:49
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 688
73% 582 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 32.4
27% 33.2 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 23
24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 16 12 134 83 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 481
Write 292
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 101
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-014.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback