Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Erazer X7843 MD99557  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RG1M
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 156
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 480
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 6780) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 48.2
41% 51.3 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 46.5
42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 206 205 158 215 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 449
Write 309
Mixed 220
SusWrite 198
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 37.5
127% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 213
186% 279 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 114%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
359GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 97.5
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7843 MD99557 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7843 MD99557

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback