Asrock B85M-HDS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B85M-HDS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160104
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 19:08
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 191
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 556
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B E147) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 12.9
12% 13.5 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37120GB 240GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 1.7 13 14 0.8 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 327
Write 35.1
Mixed 231
SusWrite 16.5
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 7.1
96% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 93
DQ Write 1.9
DQ Mixed 1.1
12% 32 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
124GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 123 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 120
Write 79.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 123
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-HDS R2.0 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-HDS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback