Asus P5LD2-VM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5LD2-VM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '22 at 17:01
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6400
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Memory 9.97
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 14.5
7% 11.7 Pts
4-Core 23.8
8-Core 32.6
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 35.3
2% 35.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 6.3
Write 14.5
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 24
9% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.11% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 404
10% 404 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5LD2-VM SE Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P5LD2-VM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback