Fujitsu FMVA03002

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Fujitsu FMVA03002 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB26C
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180308
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 133 55% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 220 28% 214 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 2 Parallax 3.1 4% 3.17 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 5.4 4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen07sm20ar128sdk 128GB 128GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 52 60 70 32 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 430 Write 238 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 59.8 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 0.5 35% 9.97 MB/s	DQ Read 79.5 DQ Write 23 DQ Mixed 15.2 21% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 10.2 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 8.3 13% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 28.8 Write 3.2 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.2 10% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.3 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Read 29.2 Write 1 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4 9% 9.93 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FMVA03002 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVA03002

CPU
Core i5-3340MIntelBench 53%, 12,487 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x

SSD
512GB 512GBMidasforceBench 112%, 637 samples	1x
128GB 128GBV-gen07sm20ar128sdkBench 59%, 67 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 2x2GBHynixBench 34%, 1,493 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 509 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16